Category Archives: Virtualization

Know What Receive Side Scaling (RSS) Is For Better Decisions With Windows 8

Posted on by
2

Introduction

As I mentioned in an introduction post Thinking About Windows 8 Server & Hyper-V 3.0 Network Performance there will be a lot of options and design decisions to be made in the networking area, especially with Hyper-V 3.0. When we’ll be discussing DVMQ (see DMVQ In Windows 8 Hyper-V), SR-IOV in Windows 8 (or VMQ/VMDq in Windows 2008 R2) and other network features with their benefits, drawbacks and requirements it helps to know what Receive Side Scaling (RSS) is. Chances are you know it better than the other mentioned optimizations. After all it’s been around longer than VMQ or SR-IOV and it’s beneficial to other workloads than virtualization. So even if you’re a “hardware only for my servers” die hard kind of person you can already be familiar with it. Perhaps you even "dislike” it because when the Scalable Networking Pack came out for Windows  2003 it wasn’t such a trouble free & happy experience. This was due to incompatibilities with a lot of the NIC drivers and it wasn’t fixed very fast. This means the internet is loaded with posts on how to disable RSS & the offload settings on which it depends. This was done to get stability or performance back for application servers like Exchange and others applications or services.

The Case for RSS

But since Windows 2008 these days are over. RSS is a great technology that gets you a lot better usage of out of your network bandwidth and your server. Not using RSS means that you’ll buy extra servers to handle the same workload. That wastes both energy and money. So how does RSS achieve this? Well without RSS all the interrupt from a NIC go to the same CPU/Core in multicore processors (Core 0).  In Task Manager that looks not unlike the picture below:

image

Now for a while the increase in CPU power kept the negative effects at bay for a lot of us in the 1Gbps era. But now, with 10Gbps becoming more common every day, that’s no longer the case. That core will become the bottle neck as that poor logical CPU will be running at 100%, processing as much network interrupts in can handle, while the other logical CPU only have to deal with the other workloads. You might never see more than 3.5Gbps of bandwidth being used if you don’t use RSS. The CPU core just can’t keep up. When you use RSS the processing of those interrupts is distributed across al cores.

With Windows 2008 and Windows 2008 R2 and Windows 8 RSS is enabled by default in the operating system. Your NIC needs to support it and in that case you’ll be able to disable or enable it. Often you’ll get some advanced features (illustrated below) with the better NICs on the market. You’ll be able to set the base processor, the number of processors to use, the number of queues etc. That way you can divide the cores up amongst multiple NICs and/or tie NICs to specific cores.

image

image

So you can get fancy if needed and tweak the settings if needed for multi NIC systems. You can experiment with the best setting for your needs, follow the vendors defaults (Intel for example has different workload profiles for their NICs) or read up on what particular applications require for best performance.

Information On How To Make It Work

For more information on tweaking RSS you take a look at the following document http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/hardware/gg463392. It holds a lot more information than just RSS in various scenarios so it’s a useful document for more than just this.

Another good guide is the "Networking Deployment Guide: Deploying High-Speed Networking Features". Those docs are about Windows 2008 R2 but they do have good information on RSS.

If you notice that RSS is correctly configured but it doesn’t seem to work for you it’ might be time to check up on the other adaptor offloads like TCP Checksum Offload, Large Send Offload etc. These also get turned of a lot when trouble shooting performance or reliability issues but RSS depends on them to work. If turned off, this could be the reason RSS is not working for you..

I’m Attending The MVP Summit 2012

Posted on by
2

I’ll be attending the MVP Summit 2012 in Redmond from the 27th of February to the 2nd of March. I consider myself very lucky to be able to do so and I’m grateful that my employer is helping me make use of this opportunity. I appreciate that enormously.

So my hotel is booked, my flights are scheduled. It’s a long flight with a lengthy stopover in Heathrow. I actually spend a day travelling to and from the event. But I’m told it’s very much worth the effort Smile and I got some great tips from some veteran MVPs in the community. For newbies who can use some information on the MVP summit take a look at What to expect at your first MVP Summit by Pat Richard.

image

I also look forward to meeting so many peers in person and attending all the briefings where we’ll learn a lot of valuable new things about Hyper-V. I cannot talk about them as they are under NDA but there will be many opportunities to provide feedback to the product teams in my expertise “Virtual Machine’” (i.e. Hyper-V). I have a bunch of questions & feedback for the product teams.

From my colleagues I have learned it’s also a good way to help pass feedback from others on to Microsoft. So this is your chance. Take it! What do you like or need in the virtualization products. What should be enhanced and what is hurting you? What works and what doesn’t?  What is missing?

With Windows 8 going into beta by next month don’t expect immediate actions and changes based on your feedback. But if you want to have your opinions taken into consideration you have to let them be heard. So don’t be shy now! Let me know. Sincere & real concerns, along with problems, challenges and feedback on your experiences with the product are very much appreciated.

So, if you have any remarks, feedback, feature requests you’d like to share with the virtualization product teams let me know. Just post them in the comments, send me a e-mail via the contact form or message me via @workinghardinit on twitter. My colleagues tell me the program managers in the virtualization area are a very communicative and responsive bunch. I think that’s true from my experiences with them in the past.

Thinking About Windows 8 Server & Hyper-V 3.0 Network Performance

Posted on by
1

Introduction

The main purpose of this post is, as mentioned in the title, to think. This is not a design or a technical reference. When it comes to designing a virtualization solution for your private cloud their are a lot of components to consider. Storage, networking, CPU, memory all come in to play and there is no one size fits all. It all depends on your needs, budget in combination with how good your  insight into your future plans & requirements are. This is not and easy task. Virtualizing 40 webservers is very different from virtualizing SQL Server, Exchange or SharePoint.  Server virtualization is different from VDI and VDI itself comes in many different flavors.

  • So what workloads are you hosting? Is it a homogeneous or a heterogeneous environment?
  • What kind of applications are you supporting? Client-Server, SOA/Web Services, Cloud apps?
  • What storage performance & features do you need to support all that?
  • What kind of network traffic does this require?
  • What does your business demand? Do you know, do they even know? Can you even know in a private cloud environment?
  • Do you have one customers or many (multi tenancy) and how are they alike or different in both IT needs and business requirements.

The needs of true public cloud builders are different from those running their own private clouds in their own data centers or in a mix of those with infrastructure at a hosting provider. On top of that an SMB environment is different from large enterprises and companies of the same size will differ in their requirements enormously due to the nature of their business.

I’ve written about virtualization and CPU considerations before (NUMA, Power Save settings for both OS & 10Gbps network performance) before. I’ve also discussed a number of posts about 10Gbps networking and different approaches on how to introduce it with out breaking the bank. In 2012 I intend to blog some more on networking and storage options with Windows 8 and Hyper-V 3.0. But I still need to get my hands on the betas and release candidates of Windows 8 to do so. You’ll notice I don’t talk about Infiniband. Well I just don’t circulate in the ecosystems where absolute top notch performance is so important that they can justify and get that kind of budget to throw at those needs.

To set the scene for these blog posts I’ll introduce some considerations around networking options with Hyper-V. There are many features and options both in hardware, technologies, protocols, file systems. Even when everything is intended to make live simpler people might get lost in all the options and choices available.

Windows Server 8 NIC features – The Alphabet Soup

  • Data Center Bridging (DCB)
  • Receive Segment Coalescing (RSC)
  • Receive Side Scaling (RSS)
  • Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)
  • Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV)
  • Virtual Machine Queue (VMQ)
  • IPsec offload (IPsecTO)

A lot of this stuff has to do with converged networks. These offer a lot of flexibility and the potential for cost savings along the way. But convergence & cost savings are not a goal. They are means to an end. Perhaps you can have better, cheaper and more effective solutions leveraging you existing network infrastructure by adding some 10Gbps switches & NICs where they provide the best bang for the buck. Chances are you don’t need to throw it all out and do a fork lift replacement. Use what you need from the options and features. Be smart about it. Remember my post on A Fool With A Tool Is Still A Fool, don’t be that guy!

Now let’s focus on couple of the features here that have to do with network I/O performance and not as much convergence or QOS. As an example of this I like to use Live migration of virtual machines with 10Gbps. Right now with one 10Gbps NIC I can use 75% of the bandwidth of a dedicated NIC for live migration. When running 20 or more virtual machines per host with 4Gbps to 8Gbps of memory and with Windows 8 giving me multiple concurrent Live Migrations I can really use that bandwidth. Why would I want to cut it up to 2 or 3Gbps in that case. Remember the goal. All the features and concepts are just tools, means to and end. Think about what you need.

But wait, in Windows 8 we have some new tricks up our sleeve. Let’s team two 10Gbps NICs put all traffic over that team and than divide the bandwidth up and use QOS to assure Live Migration gets 10Gbps when needed but without taking it away from others network I/O when it’s not needed. That’s nice! Sounds rather cool doesn’t it and I certainly see a use for it. It might not be right if you can’t afford to loose that bandwidth when Live Migration kicks in but if you can … more power & cost savings to you. But there are other reasons not to put everything on one NIC or team.

RSS, VMQ, SR-IOV

One thing all these have in common is that they are used to reduce the CPU load / bottleneck on the host and allow to optimize the network I/O and bandwidth usage of your expensive 10Gbps NICs. Both avoiding having a CPU bottleneck and optimizing the use of the available bandwidth mean you get more out of your servers. That translates in avoiding buying more of them to get the same workload done.

RSS is targeted at the host network traffic. VMQ and SR-IOV are targeted at the virtual machine network traffic but in the end the both result in the same benefits as stated above. RSS & VMQ integrate well with other advanced windows features. VMQ for examples can be used with the extensible Hyper-V switch while RSS can be combined with QOS & DCB in storage & cluster host networking scenarios. So these give you a lot of options and flexibility. SR-IOV or RDMA is more focused on raw performance and doesn’t integrate so well with the more advanced features for flexibility & scalability. I’ll talk some more on this in future blog posts.

Now with all these features that have there own requirements and compatibilities you might want to reconsider putting all traffic over one pair of teamed NICs. You can’t optimize them all in such a scenario and that might hurt you. Perhaps you’ll be fine, perhaps you won’t.

image

So what to use where and when depends on how many NICs you’ll use in your servers and for what purpose. For example even in a private cloud for lightweight virtual machines running web services you might want to separate the host management & cluster traffic from the virtual machine network traffic. You see RSS & VMQ are mutually exclusive. That way you can use RSS for the host/cluster traffic and DVMQ for the virtual machine network. Now if you need redundancy you might see that you’ll already use 2*2NIC with Windows 8 NLB in combination with two switches to avoid a single point of failure. Do your really need that bandwidth for the guest servers? Perhaps not but, you might find that it helps improve density because of better better host & NIC performance helping you avoiding the cost of buying extra servers. If you virtualize SQL servers you’d be even more interested in all this. The picture below is just an illustration, just to get you to think, it’s not a design.

image

I’m sure a lot of matrices will be produced showing what features are compatible under what conditions, perhaps even with some decision charts to help you decide what to use where and when.

KB 2636573: Guest Crashes with Win2008R2 RTM/SP1 STOP 0xD1 in storvsc!StorChannelVmbusCallback During Live Migration

Posted on by
4

The BSOD

I helped hunt down this bug and tested the private fix. Some months ago, during the summer of 2011, I was putting some new Hyper-V clusters under stress tests. You know, letting it work very hard for a longer period of time to see if anything falls off or goes “boink". It all looked pretty robust and and after some tweaking also very fast. Just when you’re about to declare “we’re all set” here you see a BSOD on one of the guests that’s being live migrated happily announcing: “DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUALSTOP: 0x000000D1 (0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000)”

image

Now that doesn’t make ME very happy however. So I investigate to see if there are any more VMs dropping dead during live migration but we don’t see any. Known issues like out of date versions of the integration tools or the like are not in play nor are any other possible suspects.

We throw the MEMORY.DMP file in the debugger and we come up with the following culprit:

DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL (d1)

The driver probably at fault is storvsc.sys

Probably caused by : storvsc.sys ( storvsc!StorChannelVmbusCallback+2b8 )

Hmmmmmmm, we start searching the internet but we don’t find much. We also throw it on to Twitter to see if the community comes up with something. Meanwhile we keep looking and find this little blog post by a Microsoft support engineer Rob Scheepens:

http://blogs.technet.com/b/dip/archive/2011/10/21/win2008r2-rtm-stop-0xd1-in-storvsc-storchannelvmbuscallback-0x2b5.aspx

We pinged Rob and opened a case with MS support. That evening Hans Vredevoort (www.hyper-v.nu), who saw my tweet, mails me with the details of a fellow MVP in the USA having this same issue. We get in contact an via both Microsoft & the Hyper-V community we start hunting the cause of this bug. The progress on this issue can be read at the Microsoft blog above. You’ll notice that the fix is in the works now.

Hunting down the STOP error

What did we establish:

  • It only happens occasionally with a live migration and it rather ad hoc, not every time, not after X amount of live migrations or X amount of up time.
  • It seems sometimes to happens only with guests running dynamically expanding VHDs attached to ISCSI controllers in Hyper-V.  But that’s not really the case as I remember one being with  fixed VHD attached to an SCSI controller. In our case the VMs we could reproduce the issue with in a reasonable time were all SQL Server test and development guests running SQL Server 2008 where the dynamically expanding disks are used as “poor man’s thin provisioning”.
  • I have not heard of this on Windows 2008 hosts, only R2, but I have not tested this.

So it’s reproducible but it takes intensive live migration activity. Meanwhile we received private instrumentation to install on both guests & hosts to collect “enriched” memory.dumps when a guest experiences a BSOD. With PowerShell we have continuous live migration running to reproduce the issue. The fact that can live migrate over 10Gbps does help Smile. Because you can get lucky but in reality needs many hundreds of live migration to reproduce it. On some machines many thousands. Not a joke but I total we did 8000 Live migrations to test the fix and we did about 12000 to reproduce the issue on several VMs with different configurations to send memory dumps to MSFT. So yes, you really need some PowerShell and having a 10Gbps Live Migration network also helps Winking smile.

All the collected MEMORY.DMP files form these live migration exercises were uploaded to Microsoft for analysis. That took a while, also because they had a boatload of live migrations to do and I don’t know if their test lab has 10 Gbps.

On Tuesday the 25th of October Microsoft contacts us with good news. They have root-caused the problem and a hotfix is in the works. You can download that here http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2636573

On Thursday 27th of October we get access to a private fix and after installing this one we’ve been running thousands of live migrations without  seeing the issue.

The public release of this hotfix is currently planned (HTP11-12) under KB2636573.

The details for the curious

Root Cause?

The root cause can be summarized as follows: “StorVSP was modifying guest memory while the VM’s virtual motherboard was being powered off.” Doing this storvsc access a NULL pointer in a memory buffer that is already freed up. The result of this is a BSOD or STOP error in the virtual machine.

Only SCSI attached VHDs

OK but why do we only see this with SCSI attach VHDs? Now the issue happens during power down of the virtual machines’ mother board because there is a disk enumeration during the shut down phase. And this enumeration only happens with SCSI disks.

Right! So the more VHDs we had attached to SCSI controllers in a virtual machine the higher the likelihood of this happening.

Why so much more likely with dynamically expanding VHDs

But still we saw this exponentially more with dynamically expanding disks. Why is that? Well it’s not that dynamically expanding disks trigger disk enumeration more than fixed disks.  However it seems that any disk expansion, which causes write delays, can lead to a timing issue that will cause the disk enumeration to hit the issue described above. So this significantly increases the risk that the STOP error will happen and it explains that the chance this will happen with fixed VHDs attached to SCSI controllers is significantly lower. This is sync with what we saw. The virtual machines with a lot of dynamic disks attach to SCSI controllers that had a lot of activity (and thus potential for expanding) is the ones where we could reproduce this the fasted.

Conclusion

It can take some time to hunt down certain bugs, especially the rare ones that only happen every now and then so occurrences are few and far between. But when you put in some effort Microsoft helps out and works on a fix. And no you don’t have to have the most expensive support contract for that to happen. As a  matter of fact this call was logged under a free support call with the TechNet Plus subscription. And as it was a bug, they return it as unused.