Category Archives: IT Pro

Kemp LoadMaster OEM Servers and Dell Firmware Updates with Lifecycle Controller

Posted on by
1

When you buy a DELL OEM based Kemp Technologies LoadMaster you might wonder who will handle the hardware updates to the server. Well Dell handles all OEM updates via its usual options and as with all LoadMasters Kemp Technologies handles the firmware update of the LoadMaster image.

KempLM320

Hardware wise both DELL and Kemp have been two companies that excel in support. If you can find the solution that meets your needs it’s a great choice. Combine them and it make for a great experience.  Let me share a small issue I ran into updating Kemp Loadmaster OEM Servers and Dell Firmware Updates with Lifecycle Controller

For a set of DELL R320 loadmasters in HA is was upgrading ( I not only wanted to move to 7.1-Patch28b-BARE-METAL.bin but I also wanted to take the opportunity to bring the firmware of those servers to the latest versions as that had been a while (since they had been delivered on site).

There is no OS that runs in those server,s as they are OEM hardware based appliances for the Loadmaster image. No worries these DELL servers come with DRAC & Lifecycle controllers so you can leverage those to do the firmware updates from a Server Update Utility ISO locally, via virtual media, over over the network, via FTP or a network share. FTP is either the DELL FTP Site or an internal one.

image

image

Now as I had just downloaded the  latest SUU at the time (SUU-32_15.09.200.74.ISO – for now you need to use the 32 bit installers with the life cycle controller) I decided to just mount it via the virtual media, boot to the lifecycle controller and update using local media.

image

image

But I got stuck  …

It doesn’t throw an error but it just returns to the start point and nothing can fix it. Not even adding “/repository”  to the file path . You can type the name of an individual DUP (32 bit!) and that works. Scanning the entire repository however wouldn’t move beyond step 2 “Enter Access Details”.

Scanning for an individual DUP seemed to work but leaving the file path blank while trying to find all eligible updates seemed not to return any results so I could not advance. The way I was able to solve this was by leveraging the DRAC ability to update it own firmware using the firmware image file to the most recent version. I just got mine by extracting the DUP and taking the image file from the payload sub folder.

image

You can read on how to upgrade DRAC / Lifecycle Controller via the DRAC here.

image

When you’ve done that, I give the system a reboot for good measure, and try again. I have found in all my cases fixes the issue. My take on this is that older firmware can’t handle more recent SUU repositories. So give it a try if you run into this and you’ll be well on your way to get your firmware updated. If you need help with this process DELL has excellent documentation here in “Lifecycle Controller Platform Update/Firmware Update in Dell PowerEdge 12th Generation Servers”

image

image

image

The end result is a fully updated DELL Server / Kemp Loadmaster. Mission accomplished. All this can be done from the comfort of your home office. A win-win for both you and your customer/employer. Think about it, it would be a shame to miss out on all the benefits you get from working in the cloud when your on premises part of a hybrid infrastructure forces you to get in a car and drive to a data center 70 km away. Especially at 21:21 at night.

BitLooker In Veeam Backup and Replication v9

Posted on by
Reply

When your backup size is bigger than the amount of disk space used in the virtual machine you might wonder why that is. Well it’s deleted data who’s blocks have not been released for reuse by the OS yet. BitLooker in Veeam Backup and Replication v9 as announced at VeeamOn 2015 offers a solution for this situation. BitLooker analyses the NFTS MFT to identify deleted data. It uses this information to reduce the size of an imaged based backup file and helps reduce bandwidth needed for replication. It just makes sense!

BitLooker In Veeam Backup and Replication v9

I really like these additions that help out to optimize the consumption of backup storage. Now I immediately wondered f this would make any difference on the recent versions of Hyper-V that support UNMAP. Well, probably not. My take on this is that the Hyper-V virtual Machine is aware of the deleted blocks via UNMAP this way so they will not get backed up. This is one of the examples of the excellent storage optimization capabilities of Hyper-V.

UNMAP

It’s a great new addition to Veeam Backup & Replication v9. Especially when you’re running legacy hypervisors like like Windows Server 2008 R2 or older, or (at the time of writing) VMware. When you’ve been rocking Windows Server 212 R2 for the last three years Hyper-V already had your back with truly excellent UNMAP support in the virtual layer.

Musings On Switch Embedded Teaming, SMB Direct and QoS in Windows Server 2016 Hyper-V

Posted on by
3

When you have been reading up on what’s new in Windows Server 2016 Hyper-V networking you probably read about Switch Embedded Teaming (SET). Basically this takes the concept of teaming and has this done by the vSwitch. Which means you don’t have to team at the host level. The big benefit that this opens up is the RDMA can be leveraged on vNICs. With host based teaming the RDMA capabilities of your NICs are no longer exposed, i.e. you can’t leverage RDMA. Now this has become possible and that’s pretty big.

clip_image001

With the rise of 10, 25, 40, 50 and 100 Gbps NICs and switches the lure to go fully converged becomes even louder. Given the fact that we now don’t lose RDMA capabilities to the vNICs exposed to the host that call sounds only louder to many.  But wait, there’s even more to lure us to a fully converged solution, the fact that we now do no longer lose RSS on those vNICs! All good news.

I have written an entire whitepaper on convergence and it benefits, drawback, risks & rewards. I will not repeat all that here. One point I need to make that lossless traffic and QoS are paramount to the success of fully converged networking. After all we don’t want lossy storage traffic and we need to assure adequate bandwidth for all our types of traffic. For now, in Technical Preview 3 we have support for Software Defined Networking (SDN) QoS.

What does that mean in regards to what we already use today? There is no support for native QoS  and vSwitch QoS in Windows Server 2016 TPv3. There is however the  mention of DCB (PFC/ETS ), which is hardware QoS in the TechNet docs on Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) and Switch Embedded Teaming (SET). Cool!

But wait a minute. When we look at all kinds of traffic in a converged Hyper-V environment we see CSV (storage traffic), live migration (all variations), backups over SMB3 all potentially leveraging SMB Direct. Due to the features and capabilities in SMB3 I like that. Don’t get me wrong about that. But it also worries me a bit when it comes to handling QoS on the hardware side of things.

In DCB Priority Flow Control (PFC) is the lossless part, Enhanced Transmission Selection (ETS) is the minimum bandwidth QoS part. But how do we leverage ETS when all types of traffic use SMB Direct. On the host it all gets tagged with the same priority. ETS works by tagging different priorities to different workloads and assuring minimal bandwidths out of a total of 100% without reserving it for a workload if it doesn’t need it. Here’s a blog post on ETS with a demo video DCB ETS Demo with SMB Direct over RoCE (RDMA .

Does this mean a SDN QoS only approach to deal with the various type of SMB Direct traffic or do they have some aces up their sleeves?

This isn’t a new “concern” I have but with SET and the sustained push for convergence it does has the potential to become an issue. We already have the SMB bandwidth limitation feature for live migration. That what is used to prevent LM starving CSV traffic when needed. See Preventing Live Migration Over SMB Starving CSV Traffic in Windows Server 2012 R2 with Set-SmbBandwidthLimit.

Now in real life I have rarely, if ever, seen a hard need for this. But it’s there to make sure you have something when needed. It hasn’t caused me issues yet, but I’m a performance & scale first, in “a non-economies of scale” world compared to hosters. As such convergence is a tool I use with moderation. My testing when traffic competes without ETS is that they all get part of the cake but not super predictable/ consistent. SMB bandwidth limitation is a bit of a “bolted on” solution => you can see the perf counters push down the bandwidth in an epic struggle to contain it, but as said it’s a struggle, not a nice flat line.

Also Set-SmbBandwidthLimit is not a percentage, but hard max bandwidth limit, so when you lose a SET member the math is off and you could be in trouble fast. Perhaps it’s these categories that could or will be used but it doesn’t seem like the most elegant solution/approach. That with ever more traffic leveraging SMB Direct make me ever more curious. Some switches offer up to 4 lossless queues now so perhaps that’s the way to go leveraging more priorities … Interesting stuff! My preferred and easiest QoS tool, get even bigger pipes, is an approach convergence and evolution of network needs keeps pushing over. Anyway, I’ll be very interested to see how this is dealt with. For now I’ll conclude my musings On Switch Embedded Teaming, SMB Direct and QoS in Windows Server 2016 Hyper-V

Trunking With Hyper-V Networking

Posted on by
4

When doing lab work, or real life implementations you’ll need to go beyond the basic 101 stuff to build solutions every now and then. This is especially true when using virtual network appliances. Networking means you’ll you’ll be dealing with Link Aggregation Groups, Trunking, MLAG, routing, LACP … in short the tools of the trade when doing networking. In my experience I use trunking in Hyper-V mostly to mimic real world scenarios where trunking is used (firewall, routers, load balancers). These tend to be limited in usable ports in real life. So even, before you run out of physical ports on your Hyper-V host to work with we leverage them to mimic the real live environment. This leads us to trunking with Hyper-V networking

I for one have used this on 10Gbps ports on bot physical and virtual load balancers in the uplink to the switches. As you can imagine when doing redundant (teaming) cabling with HA load balancers you’re consuming 10Gbps ports and not all VLANs warrant a dedicated 10Gbps uplink, even if you had ‘m.

Trunking & VLAN’s are the way we deal with this in the network hardware world and we can do the same in Hyper-V. In the Hyper-V Manager GUI you will not find a way to define a trunk on an vNIC attached to a vSwitch. But this can be done via PowerShell. So please do not reject Hyper-V as not being up to the job. It is. Let me show you how you can do trunking with Hyper-V networking.

Generally on a clean install I dump the default vNIC. DO NOT DO this blindly on an existing deployed appliance virtual machine.

#Delete the default network adapter
Remove-VMNetworkAdapter -VMName VLM200-1 -Name "Network Adapter"

I then add the number of ethernet ports I need on my Kemptechnologies virual Load Master.

#Create the VLM200 ports (4 like it's physical counterpart)
For ($Count=0; $Count -le 3; $Count ++)
{
Add-VMNetworkadapter -VMName VLM200-1 -Name "Eth$Count"
}

A peak at our handy work via Get-VMNetworkAdapter -VMName VLM200-1 shows our 4 ports.

image

As you can see I like to name my network adapters with a distinctive name. In combination with the switch name it enables me to identify the NICs better. Combine that with a good naming policy inside the VM if possible. In Windows Server 2016 you can hot add and remove vNICs and new “Device Naming”

(see Hot add/remove of network adapters and enabling device naming in Windows Server Hyper-V) functionality which only makes the experience better in relation to uptime and automation.

Now let’s say we use eth0 for management and for the HA heartbeat. That leaves Eth2 and Eth3 for workloads. We could even aggregate these (redundancy, heart beat). In this demo we’ll configure Eth3 as a trunk with a list of allowed VLANs. We keep the native VLAN ID on 0 as it is by default. Only in specific situations where you have changed this in the network should this be changed.

#Trunk Eth3 and add the required VLAnIDs
Set-VMNetworkAdaptervlan -VMName VLM200-1 -VMNetworkAdapterName "Eth3"-Trunk -AllowedVlanIdList "10, 20, 30" -NativeVlanId 0

Which delivers us what we need to get our network appliance going

image

In your virtual appliance you can now create VLANs on Eth3. How this shows up is dependent on the appliance. In this example a Kemp Virtual Load Master. Here we mimic a 4 port load master. We’re not doing trunking because we ran out of the max supported number of NICs we can add to a virtual machine.

image

A word of warning. You will not see this configuration in the settings via the GUI.
Manipulating the VLAN settings in the GUI will overwrite the settings without a warning.
So be careful with configuration of your virtual network appliance(s).  As an example I’ll touch the VLAN setting of Eth3 and give it VLAN 500.

image

We now have a look at our VLAN settings of the appliance

image

That vNIC is now in Access mode with VLAN 500. Ouch, that will seriously ruin your day in production! Be careful!

On top of this some appliances do not respond well to such misconfigurations on the switch side (both physical and virtual switches). This leads not only to service interruption but could lead to the inability to mange the appliance, requiring a reboot of them etc.

Anyway, so yes you can do trunking with Hyper-V networking on a vNIC but this normally only makes sense I you have an appliance running that knows what to do with a trunk such as a virtual  firewall, router or load balancer.