Unable to retrieve all data needed to run the wizard. Error details: “Cannot retrieve information from server “Node A”. Error occurred during enumeration of SMB shares: The WinRM protocol operation failed due to the following error: The WinRM client sent a request to an HTTP server and got a response saying the requested HTTP URL was not available. This is usually returned by a HTTP server that does not support the WS-Management protocol.

I was recently configuring a Windows Server 2012 File server cluster to provide SMB transparent failover with continuous available file shares for end users. So, we’re not talking about a Scale Out File Server here.

All seemed to go pretty smooth until we hit a problem. when the role is running on Node A and you are using the GUI on Node A this is what you see:


When you try to add a share you get this

"Unable to retrieve all data needed to run the wizard. Error details: "Cannot retrieve information from server "Node A". Error occurred during enumeration of SMB shares: The WinRM protocol operation failed due to the following error: The WinRM client sent a request to an HTTP server and got a response saying the requested HTTP URL was not available. This is usually returned by a HTTP server that does not support the WS-Management protocol.”


When you failover the file server role to the other node, things seem to work just fine. So this is where you run the GUI from Node A while the file server role resides on Node B.


You can add a share, it all works. You notice the exact same behavior on the other node. So as long as the role is running on another node than the one on which you use Failover Cluster Manager you’re fine. Once you’re on the same node you run into this issue. So what’s going on?

So what to do? It’s related to WinRM so let’s investigate that.


So the WinRM config comes via a GPO. The local GPO for this is not configured. So that’s not the one, it must come from the  domain.The IP addresses listed are the node IP and the two cluster networks. What’s not there is local host, the cluster IP address or any of the IPV6 addresses.

I experimented with a lot of settings. First we ended up creating an OU in the OU where the cluster nodes reside on which we blocked inheritance. We than ran gpupdate /target:computer /force on both nodes to make sure WinRM was no longer configure by the domain GPO. As the local GPO was not configured it reverted back to the defaults. The listener show up as listing to all IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. Nice but the GPO was now disabled.


This is interesting but, things still don’t work. For that we needed to disable/enable WinRM

Configure-SMRemoting -disable
Configure-SMRemoting –enable

or via server manager


That fixed it, and we it seems a necessity to to. Do note that to disable/enable remote management it should not be configured via a GPO or it throws an error like




Some more testing

We experimented by adding an enabling the GPO again. We then saw the listener did show the local host, cluster & file role IP address but the issue was back. Using * in just IPv 4 did not do the trick either.


What did the trick was to use * in the filter for IPv 6 and keep our original filters on IPv4. The good news is that having removed the GPO and disabling/enabling WinRM  the cluster IP address & Filer Role IP address are now in the list. That could be good for other use cases.

This is not ideal, but it all works now.

What we settled for

So we ended up with still restricting the GPO settings for IPv4 to subnet ranges and allowing * for IPv6. This made sure that even when we run the Failover Cluster Manager GUI from the node that owns the file server role everything still works.

One workaround is to work from a remote host, not from a cluster member, which is a good practice anyway.

The key takeaway is that when Microsoft says they test with IPv6 enabled they literally mean for everything.


There is a TechNet article on WinRM GPO Settings for SCVMM 2012 RC where they advice to set both IPv4 and  IPv6  to * to avoid issues with SCVMM operations. How to Add Trusted Hyper-V Hosts and Host Clusters in VMM 

However, we found that IPv6 is the key requirement here, * for just IP4 alone did not work.

NIC Teaming in Windows 8 & Hyper-V

One of the many new features in Windows 8 is native NIC Teaming or Load Balancing and Fail Over (LBFO). This is, amongst many others, a most welcome and long awaited improvement. Now that Microsoft has published a great whitepaper (see the link at the end) on this it’s time to publish this post that has been simmering in my drafts for too long. Most of us dealing with NIC teaming in Windows have a lot of stories to tell about incompatible modes depending on the type of teaming, vendors and what other advanced networking features you use.  Combined with the fact that this is a moving target due to a constant trickle of driver & firmware updates to rid of us bugs or add support for features. This means that what works and what doesn’t changes over time. So you have to keep an eye on this. And then we haven’t even mentioned whether it is supported or not and the hassle & risk involved with updating a driver Smile

When it works it rocks and provides great benefits (if not it would have been dead). But it has not always been a very nice story. Not for Microsoft, not for the NIC vendors and not for us IT Pros. Everyone wants things to be better and finally it has happened!

Windows 8 NIC Teaming

Windows 8 brings in box NIC Teaming, also know as Load Balancing and Fail Over (LBFO), with full Microsoft support. This makes me happy as a user. It makes the NIC vendors happy to get out of needing to supply & support LBOF. And it makes Microsoft happy because it was a long missing feature in Windows that made things more complex and error prone than they needed to be.

So what do we get form Windows NIC Teaming

  • It works both in the parent & in the guest. This comes in handy, read on!


  • No need for anything else but NICs and Windows 8, that’s it. No 3rd party drivers software needed.
  • A nice and simple GUI to configure & mange it.
  • Full PowerShell support for the above as well so you can automate it for rapid & consistent deployment.
  • Different NIC vendors are supported in the same team.  You can create teams with different NIC vendors in the same host. You can also use different NIC across hosts. This is important for Hyper-V clustering & you don’t want to be forced to use the same NICs everywhere. On top of that you can live migrate transparently between servers that have different NIC vendor setups. The fact that Windows 8 abstracts this all for you is just great and give us a lot more options & flexibility.
  • Depending on the switches you have it supports a number of teaming modes:
    • Switch Independent:  This uses algorithms that do not require the switch to participate in the teaming. This means the switch doesn’t care about what NICs are involved in the teaming and that those teamed NICS can be connected to different switches. The benefit of this is that you can use multiple switches for fault tolerance without any special requirements like stacking.
    • Switch Dependent: Here the switch is involved in the teaming. As a result this requires all the NICs in the team to be connected to the same switch unless you have stackable switches. In this mode network traffic travels at the combined bandwidth of the team members which acts as a as a single pipeline.There are two variations supported.
      1. Static (IEEE 802.3ad) or Generic: The configuration on the switch and on the server identify which links make up the team. This is a static configuration with no extra intelligence in the form of protocols assisting in the detection of problems (port down, bad cable or misconfigurations).
      2. LACP (IEEE 802.1ax, also known as dynamic teaming). This leverages the Link Aggregation Control Protocol on the switch to dynamically identify links between the computer and a specific switch. This can be useful to automatically reconfigure a team when issues arise with a port, cable or a team member.
  • There are 2 load balancing options:
    1. Hyper-V Port: Virtual machines have independent MAC addresses which can be used to load balance traffic. The switch sees a specific source MAC addresses connected to only one connected network adapter, so it can and will balance the egress traffic (from the switch) to the computer over multiple links, based on the destination MAC address for the virtual machine. This is very useful when using Dynamic Virtual Machine Queues. However, this mode might not be specific enough to get a well-balanced distribution if you don’t have many virtual machines. It also limits a single virtual machine to the bandwidth that is available on a single network adapter. Windows Server 8 Beta uses the Hyper-V switch port as the identifier rather than the source MAC address. This is because a virtual machine might be using more than one MAC address on a switch port.
    2. Address Hash: A hash (there a different types, see the white paper mention at the end for details on this) is created based on components of the packet. All packets with that hash value are assigned to one of the available network adapters. The result is that all traffic from the same TCP stream stays on the same network adapter. Another stream will go to another NIC team member, and so on. So this is how you get load balancing. As of yet there is no smart or adaptive load balancing available that make sure the load balancing is optimized by monitoring distribution of traffic and reassigning streams when beneficial.

Here a nice overview table from the whitepaper:


Microsoft stated that this covers the most requested types of NIC teaming but that vendors are still capable & allowed to offer their own versions, like they have offered for many years, when they find that might have added value.

Side Note

I wonder how all this is relates/works with to Windows NLB, not just on a host but also in a virtual machine in combination with windows NIC teaming in the host (let alone the guest). I already noticed that Windows NLB doesn’t seem to work if you use Network Virtualization in Windows 8. That combined with the fact there is not much news on any improvements in WNLB (it sure could use some extra features and service monitoring intelligence) I can’t really advise customers to use it any more if they want to future proof their solutions. The Exchange team already went that path 2 years ago. Luckily there are some very affordable & quality solution out there. Kemp Technologies come to mind.

  • Scalability.You can have up to 32 NIC in a single team. Yes those monster setups do exist and it provides for a nice margin to deal with future needs Smile
  • There is no THEORETICAL limit on how many virtual interfaces you can create on a team. This sounds reasonable as otherwise having an 8 or 16 member NIC team makes no sense. But let’s keep it real, there are other limits across the stack in Windows, but you should be able to get up to at least 64 interfaces generally. Use your common sense. If you couldn’t put 100 virtual machines in your environment on just two 1Gbps NICs due to bandwidth concerns & performance reasons you also shouldn’t do that on two teamed 1Gbps NICs either.
  • You can mix NIC of different speeds in the same team. Mind you, this is not necessarily a good idea. The best option is to use NICs of the same speed. Due to failover and load balancing needs and the fact you’d like some predictability in a production environment. In the lab this can be handy when you need to test things out or when you’d rather have this than no redundancy.

Things to keep in mind

SR-IOV & NIC teaming

Once you team NICs they do not expose SR-IOV on top of that. Meaning that if you want to use SR-IOV and need resilience for your network you’ll need to do the teaming in the guest. See the drawing higher up. This is fully supported and works fine. It’s not the easiest option to manage as it’s on a per guest basis instead of just on the host but the tip here is using the NIC Teaming UI on a host to manage the VM teams at the same time.  Just add the virtual machines to the list of managed servers.


Do note that teams created in a virtual machine can only run in Switch Independent configuration, Address Hash distribution mode. Only teams where each of the team members is connected to a different Hyper-V switch are supported. Which is very logical, as the picture below demonstrates, because you won’t have a redundant solution.


Security Features & Policies Break SR-IOV

Also note that any advanced feature like security policies on the (virtual) switch will disable SR-IOV, it has to or SR-IOV could be used as an effective security bypass mechanism. So beware of this when you notice that SR-IOV doesn’t seem to be working.

RDMA & NIC Teaming Do Not Mix

Now you need also to be aware of the fact that RDMA requires that each NIC has a unique IP addresses. This excludes NIC teaming being used with RDMA. So in order to get more bandwidth than one RDMA NIC can provide you’ll need to rely on Multichannel. But that’s not bad news.

TCP Chimney

TCP Chimney is not supported with network adapter teaming in Windows Server “8” Beta. This might change but I don’t know of any plans.

Don’t Go Overboard

Note that you can’t team teamed NIC whether it is in the host or parent or in virtual machines itself. There is also no support for using Windows NIC teaming to team two teams created with 3rd party (Intel or Broadcom) solutions. So don’t stack teams on top of each

Overview of Supported / Not Supported Features With Windows NIC Teaming



There is a lot more to talk about and a lot more to be tested and learned. I hope to get some more labs going and run some tests to see how things all fit together. The aim of my tests is to be ready for prime time when Windows 8 goes RTM. But buyer beware, this is  still “just” Beta material.

For more information please download the excellent whitepaper NIC Teaming (LBFO) in Windows Server "8" Beta

Integration Services Version Check Via Hyper-V Integration/Admin Event Log

I’ve written before (see "Key Value Pair Exchange WMI Component Property GuestIntrinsicExchangeItems & Assumptions") on the need to & ways with PowerShell to determine the version of the integration services or integration components running in your guests. These need to be in sync with the one running on the hosts. Meaning that all the hosts in a cluster should be running the same version as well as the guests.

During an upgrade with a service pack this get the necessary attention and scripts (PowerShell) are written to check versions and create reports and normally you end up with a pretty consistent cluster. Over time virtual machines are imported, inherited from another cluster of created on a test/developer host and shipped to production. I know, I know, this isn’t something that should happen, but I don’t always have the luxury of working in a perfect world.

Enough said. This means you might end up with guests that are not running the most recent version of the integration tools. Apart from checking manually in the guest (which is tedious, see my blog "Upgrading a Hyper-V R2 Cluster to Windows 2008 R2 SP1" on how to do this) or running previously mentioned script you can also check the Hyper-V event log.

Another way to spot virtual machines that might not have the most recent version of the integration tools is via the Hyper-V logs. In Server Manager you drill down in the “Diagnostics” to, “Event Viewer” and than navigate your way through  "Applications and Services Logs", "Microsoft", "Windows" until you hit “Hyper-V-Integration


Take a closer look and you’ll see the warning about 2 guests having an older version of the integration tools installed.


As you can see it records a warning for every virtual machine whose integration services are older than the host running Hyper-V. This makes it easy to grab a list of guest needing some attention. The down side is that you need to check all hosts, not to bad for a small cluster but not very efficient on the larger ones.

So just remember this as another way to spot virtual machines that might not have the most recent version of the integration tools. It’s not a replacement for some cool PowerShell scripting or the BPA tools, but it is a handy quick way to check the version for all the guests on a host when you’re in a hurry.

It might be nice if integration services version management becomes easier in the future. Meaning a built-in way to report on the versions in the guests and an easier way to deploy these automatically if there not part of a service pack (this is the case when the guest OS and the host OS differ or when you can’t install the SP in the guest for some application compatibility reason). You can do this in bulk using SCVMM and of cause Scripting this with PowerShell comes to the rescue here again, especially when dealing with hundreds of virtual machines in multiple large clusters. Orchestration via System Center Orchestrator can also be used. Integration with WSUS would be another nice option, for those that don’t have Configuration Manager or Orchestrator but that’s not supported as far as I know for now.

Anti Virus & Hyper-V Reloaded

The anti virus industry is both a blessing and a curse.  They protect us from a whole lot of security threats and at the same time they make us pay dearly for their mistakes or failures. Apart from those issues themselves this is aggravated that management does not see the protection it provides on a daily basis. Management only notices anti virus when things go wrong, when they lose productivity and money. And frankly when you consider scenarios like this one …

Hi boss, yes, I know we spent a 1.5 million Euros on our virtualization projects and it’s fully redundant to protect our livelihood. Unfortunately the anti virus product crashed the clusters so we’re out of business for the next 24 hours, at least.

… I can’t blame them for being a bit grumpy about it.

Recently some colleagues & partners in IT got bitten once again by McAfee with one of there patches (8.8 Patch 1 and 8.7 Patch 5). These have caused a lot of BSOD reports and they put the CSVs on Hyper-V clusters into redirected mode (https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=KB73596). Sigh. As you can read here for the redirected mode issue they are telling us Microsoft will have to provide a hotfix. Now all anti virus vendors have their issue but McAfee has had too many issues for to long now.  I had hoped that Intel buying them would have helped with quality assurance but it clearly did not. This only makes me hope that whatever protection against malware is going to built into the hardware will be of a lot better quality as we don’t need our hardware destroying our servers and client devices. We’re also no very happy with the prospect or rolling out firmware & BIOS updates at the rate and with the risk of current anti virus products.

Aidan Finn has written before about the balance between risk & high availability when it comes to putting anti virus on Hyper-V cluster hosts and I concur with his approach:

  • When you do it pay attention to the exclusion & configuration requirements
  • Manage those host very carefully, don’t slap on just any update/patches and this includes anti virus products of cause

I’m have a Masters in biology from they days before I went head over heals into the IT business. From that background I’ve taken my approach to defending against malware. You have to make a judgment call, weighing all the options with their pros and cons. Compare this to vaccines/inoculations to protect the majority of your population. You don’t have to get a 100% complete coverage to be successful in containing an outbreak. Just a sufficiently large enough part including your most vulnerable and most at risk population. Excluding the Hyper-V hosts from mandatory anti virus fits this bill. Will you have 100% success, always? Forget it. There is no such thing.