Frustrations about host level backups of Hyper-V guest clusters with Windows Server 2016

Introduction

With Windows Server 2016 came the hope and promise of improved backups for Hyper-V environments. And indeed Microsoft delivered on that and has given us faster, more scalable and more reliable backups. With VHD sets also came the promise of host based backups for guest clusters.

The problem is that this promise or, as it is perhaps better to be mild and careful, that expectation has not been met. Decent, robust host based backups of guest clusters in Windows Server 2016 are still not a reality. For me this means it blocked a few scenarios and we’re working on alternatives. This is a missed opportunity I think for MSFT to excel at virtualization.

The problem

Doing host based backup of guest clusters with VHD Set disks is supported in Windows Server 2016 under certain conditions.

At RTM it became clear that CSV inside the guest cluster was not supported.

You need a healthy cluster with all disks one line

These requirements are reflected in Errors discovered during backup of VHDS in guest clusters

Error code: ‘32768’. Failed to create checkpoint on collection ‘Hyper-V Collection’

Reason: We failed to query the cluster service inside the Guest VM. Check that cluster feature is installed and running.

Error code: ‘32770’. Active-active access is not supported for the shared VHDX in VM group

Reason: The VHD Set disk is used as a Cluster Shared Volume. This cannot be checkpointed

Error code: ‘32775’. More than one VM claimed to be the owner of shared VHDX in VM group ‘Hyper-V Collection’

Reason: Actually we test if the VHDS is used by exactly one owner. So having 0 owner also creates this error. The reason was that the shared drive was offline in the guest cluster

Unfortunately, this is not the only problems people are facing. Quite often the backup software doesn’t support backing up VHD Sets or when it does they fail. Some of those failings like being unable to checkpoint the VHD Set have been addressed via Windows Updates. But there are others issues.

Let’s look at the two most common ones.

Issue 1

You can make one backup an all subsequent backups fail. This is due to the avhdx files being in used and locked. This means that as long as the cluster is up and running the recovery checkpoint chain keeps growing. This can be “cleaned” or merged but only by taking down the cluster.

At the first backup live seems good.

image

The recovery checkpoint as a collection is indeed working.

clip_image003

All attempts at another backup fail.

clip_image005

Shutting down all cluster VMs and starting them up again does merge the recovery checkpoints.

Issue 2

You can make backups, successfully but the recovery checkpoints never get merged. clip_image007

This sounds “better” but it isn’t. There is no way to merge the checkpoint. Manually merging the checkpoints of a VHD Set is bad voodoo.

Both situations get you into problems and I have found no solution so far. At the time or writing I’m back at the “never ending” recovery checkpoint chain situation. But that can change back to the 1st issue I guess. Sigh.

I have found no solution so far

For now I have been unable to solve these problem. There is no fix or even a workaround. The only to get out if this stale mate is to shut down every node of the guest clusters and then restart them all. Just a restart of the guest nodes of the cluster doesn’t do the trick of releasing the checkpoints files and merging them. While this allows you to take one backup successfully again, the problem returns immediately. For you reference that was my issue with the October 2017 CU (KB)

The other scenario we run into is that the backups do work but the recovery checkpoints never ever merge. Not even when you shut down the all the guest VM cluster nodes and start them. With frequent backup that turns into a disaster of a never ending chain of recovery checkpoints. This is actually the situation I was in again after the November 2017 updates on both guests & hosts (KB4049065: Update for Windows Server 2016 for x64-based Systems and KB4048953: 2017-11 Cumulative Update for Windows Server 2016 for x64-based Systems).

To me this situation is blocking the use of guest clustering with VHD Sets where a backup is required. For many reasons we do not wish to go the route of iSCSI or vFC to the guest. That doesn’t cut it for us.

Conclusion

Host level backups of guest clusters in Windows Server 2016 are still a no go. This despite the good hopes we had with VHD Sets to address this limitation and which we were eagerly awaiting. For many of us this is a show stopper for the successful virtualization guest clusters. Every month we try again and we’re not getting anywhere. Hence the frustration and the disappointment.

More than 1 year after Windows Server 2016 RTM we still cannot do consistent host level backup a Hyper-V guest cluster, not even those without CSV, but also not those with standard clustered disks. Trust me on the fact that many of us have given this feedback to Microsoft. They know and I suggest you keep voicing your concerns to them in order to keep it on their radar screen and higher on the priority list. You can do this by opening support calls and by asking for it on user voice. Please Microsoft, we need these workloads to be first class citizens. I’m clearly not the only unhappy camper out there as noticeable in various support forums: Cannot create checkpoint when shared vhdset (.vhds) is used by VM – ‘not part of a checkpoint collection’ error and Backing up a Windows Failover Cluster with Shared vhdx?

Windows Data Deduplication and Cluster Operating System Rolling Upgrades

Introduction

Have you considered when Windows data deduplication and cluster operating system rolling upgrades from Windows Server 2012 R2 to Windows Server 2016 Clusters are discussed we often hear people talk about Hyper-V or Scale Out File Server clusters, sometimes SQL but not very often for a General-Purpose File Share server with continuous availability. Which is the kind I’ve done quite a number of actually.

clip_image002

Being active in an industry that produces and consumes file data in large quantities and sizes we have been early implementers of Windows cluster for General-Purpose File Shares with continuous availability. This provides us the benefits of SMB 3, ODX for both the clients and IT Operations for workloads that are not suited for Scale Out File Server deployments.

As such we have dealt with a number of Windows 2012 R2 GPFS with GA cluster that we wanted to move to Windows Serer 2016. Partially to keep the environment up to date and partially because we want to leverage the new Windows deduplication capabilities that this OS version offers. The SOFS and Hyper clusters that I upgraded didn’t have data deduplication enabled.

The process to perform this upgrade is straight forward and has been documented well by others as well as by me in regards to issues we saw in the field . We even dove behind the scenes a bit in Cluster Operating System Rolling Upgrade Leaves Traces. I have also presented on this topic in public at conferences around Europe (Ireland, Germany and Belgium) as part of our community contributions. No surprises there.

Test your assumptions

This is a scenario you can perform without any downtime for your clients when all things go well. And normally it should. I have upgraded a couple of Scale Out File Server (SOFS) and General-Purpose File Server (GPFS) cluster with Continuous availability now and those went very well. Just make sure your cluster is perfectly healthy at the start.

Naturally there are some check you need to make that are outside of Microsoft scope:

I’m pretty sure you have good backups for your file data and you should check this works with Windows Server 2016 and how it reacts during the upgrade while the server is in mixed mode. Perhaps you will or won’t be able to run backups or restore data. Check and know this.

Verify your storage solution supports and words with Windows Server 2016. It sounds obvious but I have seen people forget such details.

Another point of attention is any Anti-Virus you might have running on the file server cluster nodes. Verify that this is fully supported on Windows Server 2016. On top of that validate that the Anti-Virus still works well with ODX so you don’t run into surprises there. Don’t assume anything.

Check if the server and it components (HBA, NICs, BIOS, …) its firmware and drivers support Windows Server 2016. Sure, the rolling upgrade allows for some testing before committing but that doesn’t mean you should go ahead blindly into the unknown.

Make sure your nodes are fully patched before and after the upgrade of a cluster node.

As the file server cluster is already leveraging SMB 3 with continuous availability al the prerequisites to make that work are already take care of. If you are upgrading a File server cluster without continuous availability and are planning to start using this, that’s another matter and you’ll need to address any issues. You can do this before or after moving to Windows Server 2016. This means you’d move to a solution before you upgrade or after you have performed the upgrade to Windows Server 2016.

You can take a look at my blogs on this subject from the Windows 2012 R2 time frame such as More Tips On Dealing With Removing Short File Names When Migrating To a SMB3 Transparent Failover File Server Cluster, Migrate an old file server to a transparent failover file server with continuous availability and SMB 3, ODX, Windows Server 2012 R2 & Windows 8.1 perform magic in file sharing for both corporate & branch offices

Data deduplication takes some extra consideration

I have blogged before on how Windows Server 2016 Data Deduplication performs and scales better than it did it Windows Server 2012 R2. This also means that it works at least partially different than it did Windows Server 2012 R2. You can see this in some of the updates that came out in regards to a data corruption bug with data deduplication which only affected Windows Server 2016.

clip_image003

Given this difference, what would happen if you fail over a LUN with deduplication enable from Windows Server 2012 to Windows Server 2016 and vice versa? That’s the question I had to consider when combining Windows data deduplication and cluster operating system rolling upgrades for the first time.

Windows Server 2016 is backward compatible and will work just fine with a LUN that from and Windows Server 2012 Server that has Windows data deduplication enabled. The reverse is not the case. Windows Server 2012 R2 is not forward compatible. When dealing with data deduplication in an Operating System Rolling Upgrade scenario I’m extra careful as I cannot guarantee any LUN movement scenario will go well. With a standalone server

Once I have failed over a LUN to Windows Server 2016 node in a mixed cluster I avoid moving it back to a Windows Server 2012 R2 node in that cluster. I only move them between Windows Server 2016 nodes when needed.

I move through the rolling upgrade as fast as I can to minimize the time frame in which a LUN with data deduplication could end up moving from a Windows Server 2016 o a Windows Server 2012 cluster node.

Should I need to reverse the Operating System Rolling Upgrade to end up with a Windows Server 2012 R2 cluster again I’ll make absolutely sure I can restore the data from LUNs with data deduplication from backup and/or a snapshot from a SAN or such. You cannot guarantee that this will work out fine. So be prepared.

For “standard” non deduplicated NTFS LUNs you can fail back if needed. When data deduplication is enabled you should try to avoid that and be prepared to restore data if needed.

Final advise is always the same

Even when you have tested your upgrade scenario and made sure your assumptions are correct you must have a way out. And as always, “One is none, two is one”.

As always during such endeavors you need to make sure that you have a roll back scenario in things do not work out. You must also have a fail back plan for when things turn really bad. For most scenarios has the ability to return to the original situation built in. But things can go wrong badly and Murphy’s Law does apply. So also have the backups and restore verified just in case.

The last thing you need after a failed upgrade is telling your customer or employer “it almost worked” but unfortunately, they’ve lost that 200TB of continuous available data. Better next time doesn’t really cut it.

Quick Fix Publish : VM won’t boot after October 2017 Updates for Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10 (KB4041691)

If you had WSUS (or SCCM) running tonight with auto approval on you might have woken up this morning to virtual machines that can boot anymore.

image

Great, another update gone wrong. Time to restore from backup as that can be the fasted way to restore services when in a pickle and if you have a good solutions for that in place. For the others you can do what I did is below. Actually a couple of us MVPs were on this issue at a number of sites as our fist task this morning. But first the root cause.

Well read this link Express update delivery ISV support and you have all you need. Basically the delta and the full cumulative update of October (KB4041691 – https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4041691)  ended up in WSUS without you explicitly putting it there. That should not happen, normally the delta is not published for it to be downloaded and heaven forbid auto approved.  You could also have manually approved everything without really knowing what and why. Not a great idea at all.

image

So your VM get’s offered both of them and that is BAD!

image

Normally you get into this pickle if you some how managed to install both of these yourself or via other tools (see the link above), which you shouldn’t do.

Now if you don’t have decent restore capabilities from backups or snapshots there is another way out by removing the updates.

Boot into the problematic VM and select troubleshoot

image

Select to open the command prompt and stay away from any other auto repair options.

image

Microsoft advises to get rid of the SessionsPending reg key. To do so load the software registry hive as follows:

reg load hklm\temp c:\windows\system32\config\software

Delete the SessionsPending registry key, if it exists by running:

reg delete “HKLM\temp\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Component Based Servicing\SessionsPending” /v Exclusive

Unload the software registry hive:

reg unload HKLM\temp

Run dism /image:c:\ /get-packages to find the updates installed that caused the issue

image

The yellow one are the ones of interest and you can see the first one never even got an install time/

We now use DISM to remove these updates.  Do first create the C:\Temp folder with MD temp if it doesn’t exist yet!

dism /image:c:\ /remove-package /packagename:myproblematicpackagetoremove /scratchdir:c:\temp

image

When done, close the command prompt, shut down the VM and then start it.

image

It will take a while but if will succeed and you’ll be greeted by a logon screen. Good luck!

Important: Do not try any other repair options or removing the updates with DISM might fail. We choose to remove all 3 updates from tonight to make sure. It might suffice to remove the delta one alone but we wanted to have an VM back as it was last night so more testing can be done before it is deployed again.

So, basically, don’t auto approve updates blindly, but test, validate & roll out in phases. Have great backup and TESTED restores. All by all we were only bitten in the lab, a couple of test/dev VMs and some of our infra VMs. Most of these are redundant and are patched stagger so our services were never badly effected. That gave us time to trouble shoot and investigate and warn our colleagues. As you can see here the issue was a delta update that made it into WSUS and was installed together with the full CU. Just manually downloading the CU and testing it would not have given you the heads up. About an issue. This is a reminder you need to test your real live situation and processes as realistically as possible. When you’re done with testing and cleaning up any fallout of this issue, make sure to patch your systems again!

Update: this also goes for Windows 10 Updates

Also see fellow MVP Mikael Nystrom blog post  https://deploymentbunny.com/2017/10/11/the-october-2017-update-inaccessible-boot-device/

Update: we now also have the official MSFT response & fix for each and every scenario right here https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4049094/windows-devices-may-fail-to-boot-after-installing-october-10-version-o

Windows Server 2016 RDMA and the Hyper-V vSwitch – Part II

Introduction

In part I this article I demonstrated that some of the rules in regards to SMB Direct and the Hyper-V vSwitch as we know them for Windows Server 2012 R2 have changed with Windows Server 2016. We focused on the fact that you can expose RDMA to a vNIC exposed to the management OS created on a vSwitch. This means that while in Windows Server 2012 R2 you cannot expose RDMA capabilities via a vSwitch, even when you are using a non-teamed RDMA capable NIC, this is no longer true with Windows Server 2016.

While a demo with a vSwitch on a single NIC as we did in part I is nice it’s unlikely you’ll use this often if at all in the real world? Here we require redundancy and that means NIC teaming. To do so we normally use a vSwitch created on a native Windows NIC team. But a native NIC teaming does not expose RDMA capabilities. And as such a vSwitch created against a Windows native NIC team cannot leverage RDMA either. Which was the one of the reasons why a fully converged scenario in Windows Server 2012 R2 was too limited for many scenarios. Loss of RSS on the vNIC exposes to the management OS was another. The solution to this in Windows Server 2016 Hyper-V comes with Switch Embedded Teaming (SET). Now using SET in each and every situation might not be a good idea. It depends. But we do need to know how to configure it. So let’s dive in.

Switch Embedded Teaming (SET) exposes RDMA to the vSwitch

Switch Embedded Teaming (SET in Windows Server 2016 allows multiple identical (make, model, firmware, drivers to be supported) NICs to be used or “teamed” within the vSwitch itself. The important thing to note here this does not use windows NIC teaming or LBFO (Load Balancing and Fail Over).

SET is the future and is needed or use with the Network Controller and Software Defined Networking in Windows. SET can also be used without these technologies. While today it supports a good deal of the capabilities of native Windows NIC teaming it also lacks some of them. In general SET is meant for full or partial converged scenarios with 10GBps or better NICs, not 1Gbps networking in a (hyper)converged Hyper-V scenario.

Please see New Windows Server 2016 NIC and Switch Embedded Teaming User Guide for Download for more information as there is just too much to tell about it.

Setting it up

We start out with a 2-node cluster where each node has 2 RDMA NICs (Mellanox ConnectX-3) with RDMA enabled and DCB configured. Live migration of VMs between those nodes works over SMB Direct works. All NIC are on the same subnet 172.16.0.0/16 (thanks to Window Server 2016 Same Subnet Multichannel) and are on VLAN 110. In Failover Cluster Manager (FCM) that looks like below.

clip_image002

We’ll now use the rNICs to create a Switch Embedded Team.

#Create a vSwith
New-VMSwitch -Name RDMA-SET-vSwitch -NetAdapterName "NODE-A-S4P1-SW12P05-SMB1","NODE-A-S4P2-SW13P05-SMB2" -EnableEmbeddedTeaming $true

#This gives us a vSwitch in Hyper-V to use with the VMs this can be verified with PowerShell and in Hyper-V Manager.
Get-VMSwitchTeam -Name "RDMA-SET-vSwitch" | fl

clip_image004

Note that the teaming mode is switch independent, the only option supported with SET in Window Server 2016.

clip_image006

This also gives us a vNIC exposed to the management OS (default)

Get-VMNetworkAdapter -managementos

clip_image008

This is also visible as a vNIC in the mamagement OS called “vEthernet (RDMA-SET-vSwitch)”

Get-Netadapter -name "vEthernet (RDMA-SET-vSwitch)" | fl

clip_image010

This will be used to manage the host and to make its purpose clear we’ll rename it.

Rename-VMNetworkAdapter -ManagementOS -Name "RDMA-SET-vSwitch” -NewName “HOST-MGNT"

We’ll create 2 separate management OS vNICs for the RDMA traffic later. For now, we want the HOST-MGNT vNIC to have connectivity to the LAN and for that we need to tag it with VLAN 10.

Set-VMNetworkAdapterVlan -VMNetworkAdapterName "HOST-MGNT" -VlanId "10" -Access -ManagementOS

Get-VMNetworkAdapterVlan -ManagementOS -VMNetworkAdapterName "HOST-MGNT"

image

The vNIC actually “inherited” the IP configuration of one of our physical NICs and we need to change that to either DHCP or a correct LAN IP address and settings.

Get-NetIPAddress -InterfaceAlias "vEthernet (HOST-MGNT)"

clip_image014

You can use the code below to set the HOST-MGNT vNIC to DHCP

$IPVersion = "IPv4"
$NetAdapter = Get-NetAdapter -Name 'vEthernet (HOST-MGNT)' | ? {$_.Status -eq "up"}
$NetIPInterface = $NetAdapter  | Get-NetIPInterface -AddressFamily $IPVersion
If ($NetIPInterface.Dhcp -eq "Disabled")
{
# Clear the existing gateway or it may linger
If (($NetIPInterface | Get-NetIPConfiguration).Ipv4DefaultGateway)
{
$NetIPInterface | Remove-NetRoute -Confirm:$false
}
# Enable DHCP so IP address is obtained automaticaly
$NetIPInterface | Set-NetIPInterface -DHCP Enabled
# Make sure the DNS Servers are also obtained automatically
$NetIPInterface | Set-DnsClientServerAddress -ResetServerAddresses
}

To finalize the HOST-MGNT vNIC configuration we enable priority tagging on it. If we don’t we won’t see any traffic other than SMB Direct tagged at all!

# We set priority tagging on the Host vNIC or priority tagging will not work except SMB Direct traffic
Set-VMNetworkAdapter -ManagementOS -Name "HOST-MGNT" -IeeePriorityTag on

#Let's check our work
Get-VMNetworkAdapter -ManagementOS -Name "HOST-MGNT" | fl Name,IeeePriorityTag

clip_image016

Before we go any further we’ll remove the VLAN tag from the rNICS as we don’t want it interfering with egress traffic being tagged by them or ingress traffic being filtered because it doesn’t match the VLAN ID on the rNICs.

Set-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty -Name "NODE-A-S4P1-SW12P05-SMB1" -RegistryKeyword VlanID -RegistryValue "0"
Set-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty -Name "NODE-A-S4P2-SW13P05-SMB2" -RegistryKeyword VlanID -RegistryValue "0"

From here on we’ll focus on the RDMA capable vNICs well create and use for SMB traffic.

We create 2 vNIC on the management OS for SMB Direct traffic.

#Now add 2 host vNICs for the SMB Direct Traffic
#SMB Multichannel will take care or bandwidth aggregation and redundancy
Add-VMNetworkAdapter -SwitchName RDMA-SET-vSwitch -Name SMB-1 -ManagementOS
Add-VMNetworkAdapter -SwitchName RDMA-SET-vSwitch -Name SMB-2 -ManagementOS
#Take a peak at what we have now
Get-VMNetworkAdapter –ManagementOS

clip_image018

Now these vNIC need an IP address, this can be in the same subnet because we have Windows Server 2016 SMB multichannel.

New-NetIPAddress -InterfaceAlias "vEthernet (SMB-1)" -IPAddress 10.10.180.91 -PrefixLength 24 -Type Unicast
New-NetIPAddress -InterfaceAlias "vEthernet (SMB-2)" -IPAddress 10.10.190.91 -PrefixLength 24 -Type Unicast

#For good measure in my lab and for this use case I don’t need those vNICs registered in DNS
Get-NetAdapter -Name "vEthernet (SMB*)" | Set-DnsClient -RegisterThisConnectionsAddress:$false

We than also need to put the vNICs in the correct VLAN. Remember that DCB / PFC priority tagging needs tagged VLAN so carry that priority. Right now, we can see that these are untagged.

Get-VMNetworkAdapterVLAN -ManagementOS -VMNetworkAdapterName SMB*

clip_image020

So we tag them with VLAN ID 110

Set-VMNetworkAdapterVLAN -ManagementOS -VMNetworkAdapterName SMB-1 -Access -vlanid 110
Set-VMNetworkAdapterVLAN -ManagementOS -VMNetworkAdapterName SMB-2 -Access -vlanid 110

Get-VMNetworkAdapterVLAN -ManagementOS -VMNetworkAdapterName SMB*

clip_image022

We enable jumbo frames on the vNICs. Remember that the physical NICs in the SET have jumbo frames enabled as well.

Get-NetAdapter -Name "vEthernet (SMB-1)" | Set-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty -RegistryKey "*JumboPacket" -RegistryValue 9014
Get-NetAdapter -Name "vEthernet (SMB-2)" | Set-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty -RegistryKey "*JumboPacket" -RegistryValue 9014
#We can check this by running
Get-NetAdapter -Name "vEthernet (SMB-1)" | Get-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty -RegistryKey "*JumboPacket"
Get-NetAdapter -Name "vEthernet (SMB-2)" | Get-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty -RegistryKey "*JumboPacket"

clip_image024

Normally all traffic that is originated from vNICs gets any QOS values set to zero. There is one exception to this and that’s SMB Direct traffic. SMB Direct traffic gets tagged with its QoS priority and that is not reset to 0 as it bypasses the vSwitch completely. But if we set other priorities on other types of traffic for DCB PFC and or ETS that passes over these vNICs we must enable priority tagging on these NICs as well or they’ll be stripped away.

Set-VMNetworkAdapter -VMNetworkAdaptername SMB-1 -ManagementOS -IeeePriorityTag On
Set-VMNetworkAdapter -VMNetworkAdaptername SMB-2 -ManagementOS -IeeePriorityTag On

Get-VMNetworkAdapter -ManagementOS -Name "SMB*" | fl Name,SwitchName,IeeePriorityTag,Status

clip_image026

The association of the vNIC to pNICs is random. This also changes during creation and destruction (disabling NICs, restarting the OS). We can map a vNCI to a particular pNIC. This prevents suboptimal use of the available pNICs and provides for a well know predictable path of the traffic. We do this with the below PowerShell commands.

#Set the mappings
Set-VMNetworkAdapterTeamMapping -VMNetworkAdapterName SMB-1 -PhysicalNetAdapterName "NODE-A-S4P1-SW12P05-SMB1" -ManagementOS
Set-VMNetworkAdapterTeamMapping -VMNetworkAdapterName SMB-2 -PhysicalNetAdapterName "NODE-A-S4P2-SW13P05-SMB2" -ManagementOS
#Check the mappings
Get-VMNetworkAdapterTeamMapping -managementOS

Finally, last but not least, we should enable RDMA on our two vNICs or SMB Direct will not kick in at all.

#Enable RDMA on it
Enable-NetAdapterRDMA "vEthernet (SMB-1)", "vEthernet (SMB-2)"

Right now, we have it all configured correctly on one node of our 2-node cluster. The SMB network look like this now:

clip_image028

The cluster now looks like below.

clip_image030

We can live migrate VMs over SMB Direct in this mixed scenario where one node has pNICs RDMA NICs, 1 node has SET with vNICs for RMDA.

clip_image032

When looking at this in report mode we clearly see Node-A send SMB Direct traffic (tagged with priority 4, green) over its RDMA enabled SET vNICs to Node-B which still has a complete physical rNIC set up (blue).

clip_image034

As you can see in the screen shots above we now have RDMA / SMB Direct working with SET / RDMA vNICs on one node (Node-A) and pure physical RDMA NICs on the other (Node-B). This gives us bandwidth aggregation and redundancy. To complete the exercise, we configure SET on the other node as well. But it’s clear SET and RDAM will also work in a mixed environment.

We’ll discuss some details about certain aspects of the vNIC configuration in future articles. Things like the why and how of Set-VMNetworkAdapterTeamMapping and the use of -IeeePriorityTag. But for now, this is it. Go try it out! It’s the basis for anything you’ll do with SDNv2 in W2K16 and beyond.