Tag Archives: Azure

LDAP_ALTERNATE_LOGINID_ATTRIBUTE is a gem

Posted on by
7

Introduction

The registry value LDAP_ALTERNATE_LOGINID_ATTRIBUTE is a gem. It is found under the HKLM\SOFTWARE hive in the key \Microsoft\AzureMfa. It plays a critical part to get the NPS extension for Azure MFA to work in real-life scenarios.

LDAP_ALTERNATE_LOGINID_ATTRIBUTE is a gem

For the NPS extension for Azure MFA to work we need to have a match between the User Principal Name (UPN) in the on-premises Active Directory and in Azure Active Directory (AzureAD). The mapping between those two values is not always one on one. You can have Azure AD Connect use different a attribute to populate the Azure Active Directory UPN than the on-premises UPN.

There are many reasons you can need to do so and it happens a lot in real-world environments. Changing a UPN is possible but not always in the manner one wants. Sometimes these reasons are technical, political, or process-driven. In the end, you don’t want to break other processes, confuse your users or upset the powers that be. No matter what the reason, what can you don when you cannot change the UPN to make them match up?

LDAP_ALTERNATE_LOGINID_ATTRIBUTE is a gem

When you have installed the NPS extension for Azure MFA you will find part of its configuration in the registry. In there you can add values or leverage existing ones. One of those is LDAP_ALTERNATE_LOGINID_ATTRIBUTE. It allows using the NPS extension for Azure MFA despite the fact the UPN for users does not match between on-premises Active Directory and the UPN in Azure Active Directory.

What it does is instead of sending the on-premises UPN to Azure AD it uses an alternate value. The trick is the select the attribute that was used to populate the Azure AD UPN in scenarios where these do not match. In our example that is the mail attribute.

AD connect uses the mail attribute to populate the Azure AD UPN for our users. So we have [email protected] there.

AD DS mail attribute set to a different value than the UPN.

In our example here we assume that we cannot add an alternate UPN suffix to our Active Directory and change the users to that. Even if we could, the dots in the user name would require a change there. That could get messy, confuse people, break stuff etc. So that remains at [email protected]

Our AD DS UPN is set to the domain name suffix and the account name has no dots.

When we have the NPS extension for Azure MFA set up correctly and functioning we can set the LDAP_ALTERNATE_LOGINID_ATTRIBUTE to “mail” and it will use that to validate the user in Azure and send an MFA challenge.

LDAP_ALTERNATE_LOGINID_ATTRIBUTE to the rescue

Need help configuring the NPS extension for Azure MFA ?

By the way, if your need help configuring the NPS extension for Azure MFA you can read these two articles for inspiration.

Conclusion

There are a lot of moving parts to get an RD Gateway deployment with NPS extension for Azure MFA to work. It would be a pity to come to the conclusion it takes a potentially disruptive change to a UPN, whether on-premises and/or in Azure is required for it to work. Luckily there is some flexibility in how you configure the NPS extension for Azure MFA via its registry keys. In that respect, LDAP_ALTERNATE_LOGINID_ATTRIBUTE is a gem!

TechNine March Updates for IT Pro’s

Posted on by
Reply

TechNine March Updates for IT Pro’s

TechNine (https://www.technine.be/) is organizing its first user group event of 2020 on Tuesday 3 March. The TechNine March Updates for IT Pro’s. This is just a quick blog post to invite all who are in our neck of the woods to join us. It is hosted by the Sentia Group in Lochristi.

TechNine March Updates for IT Pro's

Content

There are 3 sessions.The first session, Micha Wets – Enterprise Mobility MVP, introduces us all to Azure Policy Guest Configurations. What can this do today and what does it mean for Windows GPO configurations in the long run? Can they co-exist? Come find out!

Microsoft launched the new EDGE chromium-based browser. Erik Moreau – Windows Insider MVP will deliver his insights about this great new browser in the second session. I hope he has some good news about one of my main complaints about it. What is that? Attend and you’ll find out.

The 3rd session is still a mystery … TechNine likes to have a last moment surprise.

Practicalities

Schedule

  • 18h00: Welcome & Food
  • 18h30: Azure Policy Guest Configurations: The end of Windows GPO? – Micha Wets
  • 19h15: The New Edge – Erik Moreau
  • 20h00: Break
  • 20h15: To be announced, stay tuned!
  • 21h00: Networking and Questions
  • 21h30: End

When: Tuesday, March 3rd, 18:00 sharp

Location: Sentia, Denen 157, 9080 Lochristi, Belgium

Join us by registering here: March Updates for IT Pro’s

Azure Site Recovery (ASR) supports IAAS managed disks region to region

Posted on by
Reply

Introduction

When we see enough progress, not perfection, and get to the point that all our minimal needs are covered is when we decide to adopt a technology, feature or solution as the default. We might even move whole sale, either over time or on an expedited time line.

clip_image002

As more and more companies reach for the cloud we see the offerings mature. That’s when cloud becomes the new normal for a majority. I’m happy to say that with managed disks we are at the point we have not many reasons not to use them. Which means latecomers get a more complete offering “out of the box” and can focus on the next generation of solutions, beyond cloud so to speak, in another wonderfully inadequate term called serverless.

What are IAAS managed disks?

Managed disks provide simpler storage management (no more storage account limits leading to managing and monitoring those accounts) along with better availability, disk level data protection with encryption, RBAC and backups, the ability to create snapshots etc. Clearly, they are the way forward. Read up on them here. I did migrate many virtual machines to them but we could not do this for equally as many despite the clear benefits. Why? Read on!

Azure Site Recovery (ASR) Supports IAAS managed disks region to region

But they had a key piece missing. ASR until last week did not allow to setup Disaster Recovery (DR) for IaaS VMs with managed disks. Those already running everything on managed disks might have found out during a hurricane or flooding scare that they could not quickly set up ASR and move those workloads to another region. I know people who were in that situation.

But as Microsoft announced public availability for the capability to Protect machines using managed disks between Azure regions using Azure Site Recovery. I’m very happy with this because I really like manage disks but this was a real show stopper for the IAAS virtual machines where ASR between regions is a hard requirement. It’s often the case in the quickly evolving cloud environment that features are missing for a while. Those can slow down adoption until they are available.

Now we have a full IAAS solution on par with on-premises VM to Azure IAAS VMs where managed disks are also supported. Which reminds me I need to check if the failback option form Azure to on-premises works already with managed disks (it used to be a one-way street with managed disks). Today, with managed disks I can say we’ve reached the point where we’ll convert the remaining IAAS virtual machines as it covers many needs and we’re confident the remainder of needs will be following.

Progress, not perfection

It’s not perfect yet. We’re still looking forward to encrypted disk support, incremental snapshots etc. But as I said, we decide and work based on progress, not perfection.

In-place upgrade of an Azure virtual machine

Posted on by
10

Introduction

In the cloud it’s all about economies of scale, automation, wipe and (redeploy). Servers are cattle to be destroyed and rebuild when needed. And “needed” here is not like in the past. It has become the default way. But not every one or every workload can achieve that operational level.

There are use cases where I do use in place upgrades for my own infrastructure or for very well known environments where I know the history and health of the services. An example of this is my blog virtual machine. Currently that is running on Azure IAAS, Windows Server 2016, WordPress 4.9.1, MySQL 5.7.20, PHP. It has never been reinstalled.

I upgraded my WordPress versions many times for both small incremental as major releases. I did the same for my MySQL instance used for my blog. The same goes for PHP etc. The principal here is the same. Avoid risk of tech debt, security risks and major maintenance outages by maintaining a modern platform that is patched and up to date. That’s the basis of a well running and secure environment.

In-place upgrade of an Azure virtual machine

In this approach updating the operating system needs to be done as well so my blog went from Windows Server 2012 R2 to Windows Server 2016. That was also an in place upgrade. The normal way of doing in place upgrades, from inside the virtual machine is actually not supported by Azure and you can shoot yourself in the foot by doing so.

The reason for this is the risk. You do not have console access to an Azure IAAS virtual machine. This means that when things go wrong you cannot fix it. You will have to resort to restoring a backup or other means of disaster recovery. There is also no quick way of applying a checkpoint to the VM to return to a well known situation. Even when all goes well you might lose RDP access (didn’t have it happen yet). But even if all goes well and that normally is the case, you’ll be stuck at the normal OOBE screen where you need to accept the license terms that you get after and upgrade to Windows Server 2016.

clip_image002

The default upgrade will boot to that screen and you cannot confirm it as you have no console access. If you have boot diagnostics enabled for the VM you can see the screen but you cannot get console access. Bummer. So what can you do?

Supported way of doing an in-place upgrade of an Azure virtual machine

Microsoft gives you two supported options to upgrade an Azure IAAS virtual machine in

An in-place system upgrade is not supported on Windows-based Azure VMs. These approaches mitigate the risk. The first is actually a migration to a new virtual machine. The second one is doing the upgrade locally on the VHD disk you download from Azure and then upload to create a new IAAS virtual machine. All this avoids messing up the original virtual machine and VHD.

Unsupported way of doing an in-place upgrade of an Azure virtual machine

There is one  way to do it, but if it goes wrong you’ll have to consider the VM as lost. I have tested this approach in a restored backup of the real virtual machine to confirm it works. But, it’s not supported and you assume all risks when you try this.

Mount your Windows Server 2016 ISO in the Windows Server 2012 R2 IAAS virtual machine. Open an administrative command prompt and navigate to the drive letter (mine was ESmile of the mounted ISO. From there you launch the upgrade as follows:

E:\setup.exe /auto upgrade /DynamicUpdate enable /pkey CB7KF-BWN84-R7R2Y-793K2-8XDDG /showoobe none

The key is the client KMS key so it can activate and the /showoobe none parameter is where the “magic” is at. This will let you manually navigate through the wizard and the upgrade process will look very familiar (and manual). But the big thing here is that you told the upgrade not to show the OOBE screen where you accept the license terms and as such you won’t get stuck there. So fare I have done this about 5 times and I have never lost RDP access due to the in-place upgrade. So this worked for me. But whatever you do, make sure you have a backup, a  way out, ideally multiple ways out!

Note that you can use  /Quiet to automate things completely. See  Windows Setup Command-Line Options

Nested virtualization can give us console access

Since we now have nested virtualization you have an option to fix a broken in-^lace upgrade but by getting console access to a nested VM using the VHD of the VM which upgrade failed. See:

Conclusion

If Microsoft would give us virtual machine console access or  DRAC or ILO capabilities that would take care of this issue. Having said all that, I known that in place upgrades of applications, services or operating systems isn’t the cloud way. I also realize that dogmatic purism doesn’t help in a lot of scenarios so if I can help people leverage Azure even when they have “pre cloud” needs, I will as long as it doesn’t expose them to unmanaged risk. So while I don’t recommend this, you can try it if that’s the only option you have available for your situation. Make sure you have a way out.

IAAS has progressed a tremendous amount over the last couple of years. It still has to get on par with capabilities we have not only become accustomed to but learned to appreciate over over the years. But it’s moving in the right direction making it a valid choice for more use cases. As always when doing cloud, don’t do copy paste, but seek the best way to handle your needs.