Tag Archives: Hyper-V

Group Video Interview: What is your favorite Hyper-V feature in Windows 8?

Posted on by
1

In 2012 the next version of Windows is one of the upcoming releases by Microsoft we all have our eyes on. We’re all about to start investigating Windows 8, a lot more than today, when the first beta version is released. Hyper-V 3.0 is going to be big especially in combination with other features in Windows 8. Together with System Center 2012  this all makes a very rich & powerful (private) cloud infrastructure.

At the Experts2Experts Virtualization Conference in London (November 2011) I not only presented on High Performance & High Availability networking for Hyper-V clusters (10Gbps goodness) but I also met a lot of peers from the industry like Aidan Finn, Jeff Wouters, Carsten Rachfahl & Ronnie Isherwood.

Carsten Rachfahl is a MVP who’s very much into Private/Public Cloud and is enthusiastic about the new features in Windows 8 like many of us are. He took the opportunity to make a video with all the above suspects on the subject of our most favorite feature in Windows 8. This was released today for all to see and enjoy.

Videointerview_What_is_your_favorite_Windows_8_feature-Didier_Van_Hoye

We had a great time making it.  Luckily for us he’s a good interviewer and we didn’t encounter too many bloopers. Enjoy! And as always, if you have any feedback or questions we’re happy to hear them.

Anti Virus & Hyper-V Reloaded

Posted on by
Reply

The anti virus industry is both a blessing and a curse.  They protect us from a whole lot of security threats and at the same time they make us pay dearly for their mistakes or failures. Apart from those issues themselves this is aggravated that management does not see the protection it provides on a daily basis. Management only notices anti virus when things go wrong, when they lose productivity and money. And frankly when you consider scenarios like this one …

Hi boss, yes, I know we spent a 1.5 million Euros on our virtualization projects and it’s fully redundant to protect our livelihood. Unfortunately the anti virus product crashed the clusters so we’re out of business for the next 24 hours, at least.

… I can’t blame them for being a bit grumpy about it.

Recently some colleagues & partners in IT got bitten once again by McAfee with one of there patches (8.8 Patch 1 and 8.7 Patch 5). These have caused a lot of BSOD reports and they put the CSVs on Hyper-V clusters into redirected mode (https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=KB73596). Sigh. As you can read here for the redirected mode issue they are telling us Microsoft will have to provide a hotfix. Now all anti virus vendors have their issue but McAfee has had too many issues for to long now.  I had hoped that Intel buying them would have helped with quality assurance but it clearly did not. This only makes me hope that whatever protection against malware is going to built into the hardware will be of a lot better quality as we don’t need our hardware destroying our servers and client devices. We’re also no very happy with the prospect or rolling out firmware & BIOS updates at the rate and with the risk of current anti virus products.

Aidan Finn has written before about the balance between risk & high availability when it comes to putting anti virus on Hyper-V cluster hosts and I concur with his approach:

  • When you do it pay attention to the exclusion & configuration requirements
  • Manage those host very carefully, don’t slap on just any update/patches and this includes anti virus products of cause

I’m have a Masters in biology from they days before I went head over heals into the IT business. From that background I’ve taken my approach to defending against malware. You have to make a judgment call, weighing all the options with their pros and cons. Compare this to vaccines/inoculations to protect the majority of your population. You don’t have to get a 100% complete coverage to be successful in containing an outbreak. Just a sufficiently large enough part including your most vulnerable and most at risk population. Excluding the Hyper-V hosts from mandatory anti virus fits this bill. Will you have 100% success, always? Forget it. There is no such thing.

Video Interview on CSV & Storage Design by Carsten Rachfahl

Posted on by
Reply

I already mentioned that during the Experts2Experts Virtualization Conference I met a lot of great people and I presented on High Performance & High Availability networking for Hyper-V clusters (10Gbps goodness). Some of the people I met I already knew from the on line community and others were unknown to me until that event. Among the attendees we found some of the usual virtualization suspects in our community like Aidan Finn, Jeff Wouters, Carsten Rachfahl, Ronnie Isherwood.

Now Carsten Rachfahl is a MVP in Virtual Machine expertise but he’s also a dynamic entrepreneur who shows a lot of initiative. Using social media he is really making in effort to get people & customers to notice important snippets of information by providing easy and fast access to them. He’s very active as a speaker, on Twitter and on his blogs. On top of that he does podcasts and video interviews. For Hyper-V information go to http://www.hyper-v-server.de/  which you can also use  as an entry point for his other sites focusing on several aspects of IT in the Microsoft sphere in Germany. Like cloud computing & Licensing. There you’ll also find the videos of interviews on these subjects. It’s quite an impressive endeavor.

Carsten took the opportunity to make some videos with all the above suspects on various subject and he recently released our interview. 2011-12-01-didier-interview

In this video we continued the discussion that Aidan started on CSV and we briefly touched on a subject you could make hour long documentaries about: storage options in Windows Hyper-V now and in the years to come. Enjoy!

Direct Connect iSCSI Storage To Hyper-V Guest Benefits From VMQ & Jumbo Frames

Posted on by
Reply

As I was preparing a presentation on Hyper-V cluster high available & high performance networking by, you guessed it, presenting it. During that presentation I mentioned Jumbo Frames & VMQ (VMDq in Intel speak)  for the virtual machine, Live Migration and CSV network. Jumbo frames are rather well know nowadays but VMQ is still something people have read about, at best have tinkered with, but no many are using it in production.

One of the reason for this that it isn’t explained and documented very well. You can find some decent explanation on what it is and does for you but that’s about it. The implementation information is woefully inadequate and, as with many advanced network features, there are many hiccups and intricacies. But that’s a subject for another blog post. I need some more input from Intel and or MSFT before I can finish that one.

Someone stated/asked that they knew that Jumbo frames are good for throughput on iSCSI networks and as such would also be beneficial to iSCSI networks provided to the virtual machines. But how about VMQ? Does that do anything at all for IP based storage. Yes it does. As a matter of fact It’s highly recommend by MSFT IT in one of their TechEd 2010 USA presentations on Hyper-V and storage.

So yes enable VMQ on both NIC ports used for iSCSI to the guest. Ideally these are two dedicated NICs connected to two separate switches to avoid a single point of failure. You do not need to team these on the host or have Multiple Path I/O (MPIO) running for this mat the parent level. The MPIO part is done in the virtual machines guests themselves as that’s where the iSCSI initiator lives with direct connect. And to address the question that followed, you can also use Multiple Connections per Session (MCS) in the guest if your storage device supports this but I must admit I have not seen this used in the wild. And then, finally coming to the point, both MPIO and MCS work transparently with Jumbo Frames and VMQ. So you’re good to go Smile